Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude Opus 4.7: Which model is more powerful?
Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude Opus 4.7 are two outstanding models, each with distinct advantages suitable for different usage needs. Gemini 3.5 Flash stands out for its combination of speed, performance, multimodal capabilities and cost for large-scale deployment, while Claude Opus 4.7 focuses more on difficult tasks, intensive coding, multi-step inference and complex professional work.
Therefore, to help users choose the most optimal tool with goals such as: programming process and agents, inference tasks and knowledge, multimodal capabilities, ecosystem and usability, and price. That’s why Download.com.vn will introduce the article Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude Opus 4.7: Which model is more powerful?we invite you to consult.
Comparison table of Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude Opus 4.7
| Features | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Level | Speed Optimization (Flash) | Flagship |
| SWE-bench Pro | 55.1% | 64.3% |
| Terminal-bench 2.1 | 76.2% | 66.1% |
| MCP Atlas (using the tool) | 83.6% | 77.3% |
| CharXiv Reasoning (multimodal) | 84.2% | 82.1% |
| Finance Agent v2 | 57.9% | 51.5% |
| OSWorld (computer use) | 78.4% | 78.0% |
| Humanity’s Last Exam | 40.2% | 46.9% |
| ARC-AGI-2 (abstract reasoning) | 72.1% | 75.8% |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens |
| Visual resolution | Not specified | Up to 2,576px / 3.75MP |
| Computer Use Support | Not supported | Supported (OSWorld: 78.0%) |
| API input price | $1.50/1M tokens | $5.00/1M tokens |
| API output price | $9.00/1M tokens | $25.00/1M tokens |
| Multi-agent framework | Antigravity Frame | Task budget + effort parameters |
What is Gemini 3.5 Flash? Advantages and disadvantages of Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash is the latest generation of AI models recently launched by Google at the Google I/O event. This version is specially designed to simultaneously optimize three factors: Super fast response speed, smart thinking and extremely economical operating costs. Gemini 3.5 Flash is aimed squarely at handling real-world workflows, supporting advanced programming and analyzing large data files.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Features:
- Efficiency: Achieve outstanding processing speeds that can be up to 4 times faster than other advanced models, at a significantly lower cost.
- Application: Designed for agent-based workflows, software development, and cybersecurity. It is capable of performing multiple inference steps, supports tool invocation, and complex document processing.
- Multimodal: Capable of handling diverse input including text, images, video, audio and PDF.
- Context window: Supports large context windows of up to 1 million tokens, allowing processing of huge volumes of apidog data.
- Price: Competitively priced, just a fraction of higher-end models. For example, the input price is 0.75 USD/1 million tokens and the output price is 3.75 USD/1 million tokens
Disadvantages of Gemini 3.5 Flash:
- Inferior at repository level programming: Only achieved 55.1% on SWE-bench Pro, 9 points lower than Claude Opus 4.7, less effective in analyzing multiple files, understanding complex codebase structures or debugging across multiple modules.
- No official Computer Use support via API: Despite scoring 78.4% on OSWorld (internal testing), the desktop interface control feature is not yet open to commercial users.
- Tightly attached to the Antigravity system: Limited integration with non-Google orchestration frameworks, less flexible than Claude Opus 4.7 for long-term projects.
What is Claude Opus 4.7? Advantages and disadvantages of Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 is the premium flagship model from Anthropic, specifically designed for complex problems that require multi-step thinking, in-depth research and expert-level programming. The model provides sharp reasoning capabilities and high reliability for large enterprise tasks.
This version is excellently optimized for long-running agents thanks to its deep context management capabilities. Image processing capabilities have also been strongly upgraded to 3.75 megapixels, helping to accurately identify every small detail on technical charts or complex scanned documents.
Features of Claude Opus 4.7:
- Programming power and in-depth reasoning: Scored 64.3% on SWE-bench Pro (9 points higher than Gemini 3.5 Flash), excels in repository-level technical tasks and defensive code with good margin handling.
- Full Computer Use support: There is an API to control mouse, keyboard and automatic application navigation, reaching 78.0% on OSWorld-Verified, suitable for agent tasks that need to interact directly with the computer interface.
- High resolution image processing: Supports images up to 2,576px (3 times higher than the previous version), helping to understand microscopic details on technical diagrams, circuit boards or complex maps.
- Flexibility in long-term workflow management: Uses Task Budgets and xhigh effort levels to maintain performance on long runs, not tied to any orchestration framework.
- Infer deeper knowledge: Scored 46.9% on Humanity’s Last Exam (6.7 points higher than Gemini 3.5 Flash), performing better on tasks requiring graduate-level thinking in science, mathematics, and humanities.
Disadvantages of Claude Opus 4.7:
- Cost is 3 times higher: 5.00 USD/1 million input tokens and 25.00 USD/1 million output tokens, significantly more expensive for large-scale projects.
- Slower processing speed: Only reaches about 50 tokens/second, nearly 4 times slower than Gemini 3.5 Flash.
- Weaker in coordinating financial tools and workflow: Scored lower on tools-intensive tasks and financial process automation compared to Gemini 3.5 Flash.
Therefore, with the information above, users need to consider choosing Claude Opus 4.7 to handle advanced analysis and complex source code writing. Or Gemini 3.5 Flash to process, filter raw data and summarize large documents thanks to the advantages of extremely fast speed and low cost.
Post Comment